• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 16:58:25 +0100
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030708100540.023f4640@s...>
• References: <000b01c34555$a9074af0$6401a8c0@tbp1><Pine.LNX.4.44.0307082054410.16181-100000@l...>

At 10:19 08/07/2003 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>Unfortunately, that set the stage for some really unpleasant 
>battles.  From my perspective as a Web developer, a bunch of arrogant SGML 
>people (and Microsoft!) were walking up to the place that had given us 
>CSS, pronounced it inadequate for real work, and said it was time to start 
>over.  Integration with CSS came a lot later, after bad blood had been 
>around for a long time.

Perhaps. But as Thomas is saying/implying.
the real winners are those who use both?
  CSS is crap at some things XSLT is good at.
  XSLT is crap at some things CSS does well.

Let Chris / Bert keep their own corners.

regards DaveP
   

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: Michael Day <mikeday@y...>
  • Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Next by Date: RE: Handling of significant whitespace in .NET XmlReade r
• Previous by thread: RE: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Next by thread: Re: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread