• To: bry@i...
• Subject: Re: mathml Content question
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 15:34:58 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <000901c3455c$6da65170$2001a8c0@bryans>
• References: <000901c3455c$6da65170$2001a8c0@bryans>

> For example can one in Mathml say the
> following: 

> (p->q),((~q)->(~p));

Yes.

(Or at least the two statements (p->q) and ((~q)->(~p))
if the , and ; were intended to have formal meaning there, the answer is
probably still yes, but it depends what you meant.

David


________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: mathml Content question
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>

• References:
  • mathml Content question
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XSLT vs. CSS (Re: Indexing)
• Next by Date: Re: How important are CDATA sections?
• Previous by thread: mathml Content question
• Next by thread: RE: mathml Content question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread