• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: (data) medium is the message
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 15:28:01 +1000
• References: <601F6322AD71D5118D6C00034725152910FF2481@s...> <r01050400-1025-D52077D97C1A11D7A1520003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <soccbv8rnu4pf7cgehq5eaf6ju052mndrf@4...>

From: "Arjun Ray" <aray@n...>


> "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...> wrote:
> 
> | The vast majority of people are going down the "we need prior agreement 
> | on all semantics" path. 
> 
> I assume there is an emphasis on the word "all", else I can't imagine a
> practicable system for any kind of information exchange among independent
> parties. 

As well as being used for half-way or neutral format, XML is also used as a facade
for existing systems: in that kind of case it is not so much a question of 
"lets agree on what X means!" as much as "I want X, can I glean it from
your Y or Z?" IYSWIM

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • RE: (data) medium is the message
    • From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@s...>
  • RE: (data) medium is the message
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: (data) medium is the message
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
• Next by Date: Re: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
• Previous by thread: Re: (data) medium is the message
• Next by thread: RE: (data) medium is the message
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread