• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: (data) medium is the message
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 14:43:30 +0100
• In-reply-to: <soccbv8rnu4pf7cgehq5eaf6ju052mndrf@4...>
• References: <r01050400-1025-D52077D97C1A11D7A1520003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]><601F6322AD71D5118D6C00034725152910FF2481@s...><r01050400-1025-D52077D97C1A11D7A1520003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

At 09:51 AM 5/5/2003 +0000, Arjun Ray wrote:
>| I translate that as "we need information totalitarianism", but it's
>| painfully common.
>
>"Information anarchism" isn't likely to produce useful results either.  So
>much for inventing tags as you go or as the spirit moves you.  (Which, I
>might add, seems to be an at least implicit agenda in major parts of the
>XML world.)

I'm not sure either extreme makes sense - working toward the middle seems 
far more sensible to me.  I find prior agreement brittle and complete 
anarchy largely unworkable, but some balance of flexibility and shared 
expectations seems plausible to me.

• References:
  • RE: (data) medium is the message
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • RE: (data) medium is the message
    • From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@s...>
  • Re: (data) medium is the message
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working Drafts
• Next by Date: RE: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
• Previous by thread: Re: (data) medium is the message
• Next by thread: Re: (data) medium is the message
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread