• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: xml:namespace
• From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>
• Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 18:22:27 +0100

Overheard in the corridor, xml-europe 2003.
The speakers would (IMO) have standing here.

"I checked with 4 different language implementations,
and they all agree there are pieces of it that don't work. "

The summary was that ns have got it wrong! It's broken.
I find them useful for disambiguating vocabs.

What are the alternatives?
What's wrong with them as they stand?
  Are my two speakers wrong in their conclusions?

<grin/> Apart from Joe English wanting plain tags :-)
Curious DaveP

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xml:namespace
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
• Next by Date: RE: xml:namespace
• Previous by thread: Re: Blended Authentication (AKA "Granular Access Control")
• Next by thread: Re: xml:namespace
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread