• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: xml:namespace
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 18:20:39 +0000
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030507181836.00af5d40@p...>
• References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030507181836.00af5d40@p...>

Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...> wrote:

| Overheard in the corridor, xml-europe 2003.

Look out, The Permathread has escaped!

| I find them useful for disambiguating vocabs.

I don't.  There is no solution for arbitrary syntactic combination in the
general case.  "Doctor, it hurts when I do this!"  "So, don't do it."
 
| What are the alternatives?

Loaded question.  Are we talking about what one luminary like to term
"deployed software", or are we really interested in an investigation of
the problem domain?

| What's wrong with them as they stand?

They don't hurt until they do.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xml:namespace
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>

• References:
  • xml:namespace
    • From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@n...>

• Prev by Date: XML GUI, an XML based cross platfrom UI toolkit
• Next by Date: Re: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
• Previous by thread: xml:namespace
• Next by thread: Re: xml:namespace
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread