• To: "'Cavnar-Johnson, John'" <JCavnar-Johnson@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
• From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 09:53:46 -0700

> Whether or not you think this is a good design, it's clearly 
> an example of
> an XML application taking advantage of those distinctions for element
> content defined to represent a number.

Interesting.  Of course, in another context, those three syntactic devices
might be interpreted differently.  

The example you gave seems like an evil method for data hiding, rather than
a meaningful interpretation of syntax.  Would it have been any harder just
to enumerate the three cases you mentioned and give them meaningful string
representations in XML?  I think not.  

• Prev by Date: RE: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
• Next by Date: xml:namespace
• Previous by thread: RE: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML
• Next by thread: still import problem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread