• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:42:57 -0500
• References: <081d01c2d70c$07e89e60$4bc8a8c0@A...><7c.35a8563b.2b7ff77d@a...><06cb01c2d5b0$d0073990$4bc8a8c0@A...><3E4FC824.4040208@t...> <15951.61361.478169.191803@m...><081d01c2d70c$07e89e60$4bc8a8c0@A...><5.2.0.9.0.20030218101751.032e4ec8@n...>

[Jonathan Robie]

> At 09:30 AM 2/18/2003 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
> >Publishers can reasonably expect authors to install and
> >maintain their own copies of Word (or OpenOffice) at home, but they
> >cannot expect the same for XML authoring software.
>
> Yep. It's hard for users to write documents in XML. I wonder if that will
> change with Microsoft's new Office software.
>
> Anyone have opinions on that?
>

It will require more specialists to set up anything that does not come
standard - Word 11 needs to have an XML Schema at a minimum (and then some
kind of styleing instructions) to give the user any help authoring a
document.  But if set up, it may turn out to be really nice.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Historical question about namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering theoriginal XML vision)
• Previous by thread: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Next by thread: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread