• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 16:10:18 +1100
• References: <7c.35a8563b.2b7ff77d@a...><06cb01c2d5b0$d0073990$4bc8a8c0@A...><3E4FC824.4040208@t...> <15951.61361.478169.191803@m...>

From: "David Megginson" <david@m...>

> Perhaps that was the biggest difference: SGML was designed to make
> life easier for users, while XML was designed to make life easier for
> developers.  Fortunately, it turned out that when developers are
> happy, they write lots of software, and that ends up making users
> happy as well.

I don't believe users are happy.

At least, not the publishing users.  By making it easy for developers, we
have a lot of software which is good for data transmission but still very
little that is an advance for data capture.  

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Safari and XSLT
• Next by Date: Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision)
• Previous by thread: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Next by thread: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread