Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I guess my real question is that if so many people thinks highly of other schema languages, why don't I see tools supporting them? I can understand that large vendors like Microsoft want to stick to one language because they want to have a coherent story to tell to their customers or because they have many non-technical reasons when it comes to choose a technology. but I thought there are other kinds of people, who can make decisions mostly based on a technical reason. One of such people I think is those who involves in open-source projects (like JaxMe) or those who are making free software (like libxml). > good enough alternatives for us humans. In short, the WG must recognize > that there are other schema languages in use out here and try to find that > *niche* for WXS that appeals especially to dataheads, which was the reason > to make WXS in the first place. He he, so you consider that W3C XML Schema is for a niche? That's, uh, encouraging :-) regards, -- Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI 408-276-7063 (x17063) Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi@s...
|
