• To: jjb5@c...
• Subject: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 16:54:22 GMT
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <p05100304b9e858726d18@[128.253.245.111]> (message from JoelBender on Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:26:20 -0500)
• References: <200211011537.PAA08280@m...> <p05100304b9e858726d18@[128.253.245.111]>

  So perhaps the W3C can recommend a way to describe the mapping 
  being used in a document or document fragment, similar to

     <myStuff xml:entities="http://simonstl.com/projects/ents/HTMLrules.xml">
         When it's 100&deg;F out, it's hot for Ithaca.
     </myStuff>

The problem with trying to layer things is that that fragment is not
well formed. If an undefined entity was a validity rather than a well
formed error then this layering would be fine. Personally I think that
this is the only change required in this area for XML 2. A common set of
mappings is needed for other reasons, but that doesn't impact on XML
versioning.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: Joel Bender <jjb5@c...>

• References:
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: Joel Bender <jjb5@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Next by Date: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Previous by thread: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Next by thread: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread