• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• From: Joel Bender <jjb5@c...>
• Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:26:20 -0500
• In-reply-to: <200211011537.PAA08280@m...>
• References: <200211011537.PAA08280@m...>

>We need all the people who think they need a new mechanism to get
>together and thrash out what they really need.  And very few of those
>people are on the Core WG.

I may be over simplifying the problem...

It might be relatively easy for the various groups to agree on a 
document format to express name to character mappings, like Simon's 
Ent.  So perhaps the W3C can recommend a way to describe the mapping 
being used in a document or document fragment, similar to

     <myStuff xml:entities="http://simonstl.com/projects/ents/HTMLrules.xml">
         When it's 100&deg;F out, it's hot for Ithaca.
     </myStuff>

The W3C gets out of the naming game, but there is at least a hook 
that applications can use to get/cache/recognize character sets. 
Groups can cooperate on short and long names for characters as 
necessary, and XML doesn't change.


Joel

-- 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• References:
  • Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Next by Date: Re: Do you use Substitution Groups?
• Previous by thread: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Next by thread: Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread