• To: vdv@d... (Eric van der Vlist)
• Subject: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:47:34 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1035207255.28819.212.camel@ibook> from "Eric van der Vlist" at Oct 21, 2002 03:34:14 PM

Eric van der Vlist scripsit:

> > Adding
> > the new name characters avoids the "usable xor standard" dilemma; adding
> > the newline conventions avoids the "well-formed xor plaintext" dilemma.
> 
> The first one being the Ethiopian XML Interest Group and the second one
> IBM finding themselves together in the XML 1.1 boat for different
> reasons?

Just so.

-- 
John Cowan                                <jcowan@r...>     
http://www.reutershealth.com              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Yakka foob mog.  Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork.  Chumble spuzz.
    -- Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"

• References:
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!
• Next by Date: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!
• Previous by thread: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread