• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 08:35:02 -0500

http://news.com.com/2100-1040-962605.html?tag=fd_top_3

Looks like another giant may snub XForms.   Y'all  
going after Adobe too?

Also an article with a lot of historical revisionism.
It would be fascinating to see a press article where 
a major company says, "yeah, we got it all wrong 
to begin with".  Adobe definitely wasn't positioning 
PDF as a forms system eight years ago or adopting 
markup when they were in the Beltway making presentations 
at NIST trying to show why markup was the wrong approach 
for document systems.

len

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: XML as "passive data" (Re: The Browser Warsare Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!)
• Next by thread: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread