• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XML as "passive data" (Re: The Browser Warsare Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!)
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:00:45 -0400
• References: <87B98F88-E662-11D6-9DF2-0030657E2F34@m...>

[<tblanchard@m...>]
>
> But seriously, I acknowledge the need for an object serialization
> format that works for interchange.  My current dismay arises at least
> partially from finding XML a poor fit for this function.

Right, XML was not developed particularly for that purpose and it can be
awkward to use it thusly.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • Re: XML as "passive data" (Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!)
    • From: tblanchard@m...

• Prev by Date: Blanchard's Law, was: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Next by Date: The Browser Is Melting! Long Live the Smart Document!
• Previous by thread: Re: XML as "passive data" (Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!)
• Next by thread: RE: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread