• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:15:31 -0400
• In-reply-to: <200210211333.JAA25797@m...>

jcowan@r... (John Cowan) writes:
>People who do not need XML 1.1 need not worry about it until their
>business partners start to send it.  Then they should find plenty of
>tools available.

Business partners, right.  I don't object strongly to XML 1.1, but I do
object to notions of communication that are just about business
partners.  

Of course, who else would be using an IBM mainframe?  

(The other character issues are more likely to surface in non-business
contexts, of course.)


-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Next by Date: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!
• Previous by thread: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: Perceived C/B for XML 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread