• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 15:13:48 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <003001c26a2e$b4bb5150$0400a8c0@gandalf> <3D9B4330.5080904@t...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510

 > If I'm going to be accepting transactions encoded
> in XML my *business* level validation is going to be doing a lot of ...

Sure, if your business application has ben (re)written to understand XML 
and isn't, instead, legacy code fronted by an XML wrapper.  My guess is 
that it will be a real long time before hardcore "real monetary value" 
apps get rewritten to be XML-aware from the ground up.
	/r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread