• To: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 12:22:37 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <003001c26a2e$b4bb5150$0400a8c0@gandalf> <3D9B4330.5080904@t...> <3D9B456C.1050607@d...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Rich Salz wrote:

>> in XML my *business* level validation is going to be doing a lot of ...
> 
> Sure, if your business application has ben (re)written to understand XML 
> and isn't, instead, legacy code fronted by an XML wrapper.  

Good point.  Any wrapper that includes XSD validation is going to be an 
awfully thick "wrapper" though.  And a *lot* of people are writing apps 
that read in XML right now today; I wonder how many of them are 
including an XSD valudation step? -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • xsd validation was RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
  • RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>

• References:
  • RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: "Aaron Skonnard" <aarons@d...>
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by thread: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread