• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:23:02 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3D9B456C.1050607@d...>

Rich Salz:
> Sure, if your business application has ben (re)written to understand
> XML and isn't, instead, legacy code fronted by an XML wrapper.  My
> guess is that it will be a real long time before hardcore "real
> monetary value" apps get rewritten to be XML-aware from the ground up.

And by the time they do get rewritten to be XML-aware, the definition of
XML-aware will be so enormous that there isn't much benefit.


-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• References:
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Previous by thread: Re: xsd validation was RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread