• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 11:54:38 -0400
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-9CAC4260D55511D6BFD20003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>
• References: <p0433010ab9bf68a76f92@[192.168.254.4]>

At 11:51 AM 10/1/2002 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>Elliotte Rusty Harold notes:
> > Don't forget that DOM3 Abstract Schemas is precedent for killing a
> > spec that is off the rails. It doesn't happen often, but it does
> > happen.
>
>Did that get killed because it went off the rails, or because of lack of
>interest?  Lots of W3C projects seem to wither for lack of interest.

I think there was lots of interest, but also conviction that something 
along these lines was worth doing right, in a way that generalized across 
W3C specs.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: Re: Ann: Guide to the XML Schema Specifications
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread