• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:51:12 -0400
• In-reply-to: <p0433010ab9bf68a76f92@[192.168.254.4]>

Elliotte Rusty Harold notes:
> Don't forget that DOM3 Abstract Schemas is precedent for killing a 
> spec that is off the rails. It doesn't happen often, but it does 
> happen.

Did that get killed because it went off the rails, or because of lack of
interest?  Lots of W3C projects seem to wither for lack of interest. 

I'd be curious to know, if such is possible.



-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by Date: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread