• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:58:39 -0400
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20021001115351.049add38@n...>

Jonathan Robie writes with regard to DOM Abstract Schema:
> I think there was lots of interest, but also conviction that something 
> along these lines was worth doing right, in a way that generalized 
> across W3C specs.

So perhaps they wanted a larger boondoggle even further off the rails?

(If "generalized across W3C specs" includes "incorporates W3C XML
Schema", it's hard to read it otherwise.)


-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• References:
  • Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Ann: Guide to the XML Schema Specifications
• Next by Date: RE: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Next by thread: Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread