Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Karl Waclawek wrote: >... > > This works only when the information exchanged and the behaviour > of the client is rather simple. As a corporate developer I have > not come across a client yet that I could have implemented > with a browser, not from a GUI capability point of view, > nor from a user interaction standpoint. I'm amazed to hear that. You're a corporate developer and your corporation has not deployed a single web client app. Not bug tracking. Not content management. Not issue tracking. Not expense report submission. Are you saying your intranet does not use HTTP POST, only HTTP GET? > And often - this is a heretic opinion here - I would prefer > DCOM or CORBA over XML for client/middle tier interaction, > simply because XML/SOAP imposes a rather simple communication > model, unless one is willing to re-invent CORBA based on XML. How can the two halves of your sentence be reconciled? If XML can emulate CORBA then it by definition does not impose a communication model that is less sophisticated than CORBA. Paul Prescod
|
