• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 15:08:24 +1000
• References: <MABBLFFBAGDONBKFHNFLOEAMDBAA.hchatfield@u...> <200210181621.15396.iandeli@c...> <200210181648.13284.iandeli@c...>

From: "Ian Tindale" <iandeli@c...>

> How does this tell anyone that this once upon a time had a semantically loaded 
> structural meaning such as 

<caption><strong>Diagram 5.4: </strong>Version of inductive coupling using 
0.5pF polyester capacitors.</caption>

I think there are two responses to this: 

 1) An XSL-FO system can augment the FO with inline links or element type 
information in an appropriate namespace.

 2) A system could use external links (such as PageSeeder uses, to link between 
the original document and the FO.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • RE: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: "W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P." <hchatfield@u...>
  • Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: Ian Tindale <iandeli@c...>
  • Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: Ian Tindale <iandeli@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: architectural forms and schema type derivation
• Next by Date: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Previous by thread: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by thread: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread