• To: Ian Tindale <iandeli@c...>
• Subject: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:30:19 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <MABBLFFBAGDONBKFHNFLOEAMDBAA.hchatfield@u...> <200210181621.15396.iandeli@c...> <200210181648.13284.iandeli@c...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Ian Tindale wrote:
> In fact, what's the difference between storing cached FO docs and storing 
> final PDF docs, in that case?Ian Tindale wrote:
> In fact, what's the difference between storing cached FO docs and storing 
> final PDF docs, in that case?

People rarely load PDF documents into plain text editors to see what's in
them. And they become *really* upset if the Acrobat Reader they have
installed pops up a small dialog box stating a version problem instead of
displaying some nicely formatted pages.

J.Pietschmann

• References:
  • RE: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: "W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P." <hchatfield@u...>
  • Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: Ian Tindale <iandeli@c...>
  • Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
    • From: Ian Tindale <iandeli@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by Date: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Previous by thread: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Next by thread: Re: Future of XSL-FO at W3C??
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread