[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Prescod" <paul@p...> > In the standard modern architecture, you would use something like VFP to > talk to the relational database on the server side and generate an XML > view of the data. (XML+HTTP or XML+SOAP, depending on your tastes) Then > the client neither knows nor cares that the data is stored relationally. > And you can hook up dozens of different kinds of clients. A simple HTML > form one for the lynx users, a DHTML one for the IE 6 users, a VB one > for those willing to install a server app, a Java one for the Linux > clients, etc. It isn't browser OR VFP. It's using each at what it excels at. This works only when the information exchanged and the behaviour of the client is rather simple. As a corporate developer I have not come across a client yet that I could have implemented with a browser, not from a GUI capability point of view, nor from a user interaction standpoint. And often - this is a heretic opinion here - I would prefer DCOM or CORBA over XML for client/middle tier interaction, simply because XML/SOAP imposes a rather simple communication model, unless one is willing to re-invent CORBA based on XML. Karl
|

Cart



