• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:01:00 -0400
• In-reply-to: <001101c27729$eb7c1fa0$0207a8c0@karl>

karl@w... (Karl Waclawek) writes:
>This works only when the information exchanged and the behaviour
>of the client is rather simple. As a corporate developer I have
>not come across a client yet that I could have implemented
>with a browser, not from a GUI capability point of view,
>nor from a user interaction standpoint.
>
>And often - this is a heretic opinion here - I would prefer
>DCOM or CORBA over XML for client/middle tier interaction,
>simply because XML/SOAP imposes a rather simple communication
>model, unless one is willing to re-invent CORBA based on XML.

So what exactly are you using XML for?  Storage?

-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• References:
  • Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Next by Date: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Previous by thread: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Next by thread: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wa rs!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread