[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • To: "Miles Sabin" <miles@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
  • Subject: RE: fwd: metaphorical Web
  • From: "Don Box" <dbox@m...>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:33:47 -0700
  • Thread-index: AcJ1w3Wh5C5De7O9RFW0WiB1JdPF2gAPrLDg
  • Thread-topic: fwd: metaphorical Web

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miles Sabin [mailto:miles@m...]
> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:48 AM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  fwd: metaphorical Web
> 
> Don Box wrote,
> > Or of course the ever popular F. "Don didn't actually say all that"
-
> > the piece was not a literal (or even close to literal) transcript of
> > the talk; rather, it was one person's interpretation and analysis of
> > what was said.
> >
> > That stated, I hold myself responsible and not Kurt. I've always
> > considered myself a fairly competent communicator, but Kurt's blog
> > made me question my abilities to accurately convey my ideas and
> > beliefs verbally.
> 
> Hmm ... so what did you _actually_ say? I'm having a hard time working
> back from what Kurt reported to anything plausible.

1) Sending/processing SOAP messages independent from transport is
interesting - and WS-Routing and WS-Security help, especially in the
face of SOAP intermediaries. 

2) A lot of interesting XML apps never see XML 1.0, only infosets. This
is widespread practice for in-memory scenarios today. Whether this
practice becomes commonplace across memory/host boundaries in a
heterogeneous environment is an open question.

3) Type assignment (a la PSVI) solves some interesting problems. 

DB






Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member