• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: fwd: metaphorical Web
• From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 20:59:50 +0100
• In-reply-to: <CFC4F26947496E4092489B2425614958062AFE09@s...>
• References: <CFC4F26947496E4092489B2425614958062AFE09@s...>

Don Box wrote,
> > Hmm ... so what did you _actually_ say? I'm having a hard time
> > working back from what Kurt reported to anything plausible.
>
> 1) Sending/processing SOAP messages independent from transport is
> interesting - and WS-Routing and WS-Security help, especially in the
> face of SOAP intermediaries.
>
> 2) A lot of interesting XML apps never see XML 1.0, only infosets.
> This is widespread practice for in-memory scenarios today. Whether
> this practice becomes commonplace across memory/host boundaries in a
> heterogeneous environment is an open question.
>
> 3) Type assignment (a la PSVI) solves some interesting problems.

Hmm ... back to CORBA/RMI/DCOM with angle brackets, again.

Yawn.

Cheers,


Miles

• References:
  • RE: fwd: metaphorical Web
    • From: "Don Box" <dbox@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!
• Next by Date: Re: XML, routing
• Previous by thread: RE: fwd: metaphorical Web
• Next by thread: a minimal SAX application in Java
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread