• To: "'Joshua Allen'" <joshuaa@m...>, "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@p...>, "'Gert Baudoncq'" <Gert.Baudoncq@w...>
• Subject: RE: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 18:19:12 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <4F4182C71C1FDD4BA0937A7EB7B8B4C1061BAA48@r...>
• Organization: Propylon
• Reply-to: <bill.dehora@p...>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua Allen [mailto:joshuaa@m...] 
> 
> In fact I 
> would say that the existence of such implementations is a key 
> measure of how successful SVG is.  If SVG requires one or two 
> big Gorilla benefactors to keep it alive, I would claim it is 
> a failure and never should have been standardized.  
> Thankfully I feel that is not the case with SVG.

I wonder what would happen if a few gorillas pulled the plug on W3C XML
Schema.


Bill de hÓra 
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

 

• References:
  • RE: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
    • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
• Next by Date: RE: fwd: metaphorical Web
• Previous by thread: RE: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
• Next by thread: Re: Microsoft and vector graphics (Was:XDocs and XForms?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread