• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:15:36 +0000
• In-reply-to: <200209301815.OAA23164@m...>
• References: <mq2hpugne3pk7avtvoc7l1cmqr2u1i9fin@4...> <200209301815.OAA23164@m...>

John Cowan <jcowan@r...> wrote:
| Arjun Ray scripsit:

|> Wouldn't it be better to have the PI target imply the *presence* of a 
|> notation reference within the body, as per some internal *syntax* which 
|> it would be the purpose of the target to identify?  
| 
| I don't follow you.

The difference between

 <?foo ...?>

and

 <?xmlbar foo ... ?>

where 'foo' by intent is a name in a notation declaration, where this
syntactic understanding is captured in a formal specification of the
meaning of a reserved word such as 'xmlbar'.  See, e.g.,

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=8f984tspdol3789jrji9eptdtt5cacflje@4...
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=uah54tcuuebuf51a364n1jq1faufrnmd1r@4...

• References:
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Previous by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• Next by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread