• To: aray@n... (Arjun Ray)
• Subject: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:03:09 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <mq2hpugne3pk7avtvoc7l1cmqr2u1i9fin@4...> from "Arjun Ray" at Sep 30, 2002 05:39:32 PM

Arjun Ray scripsit:

> Doesn't "can" leave room for false positives?  Wouldn't it be better to
> have the PI target imply the *presence* of a notation reference within the
> body, as per some internal *syntax* which it would be the purpose of the
> target to identify?  

I don't follow you.

Yes, a PI target in the instance might match a notation declaration by chance
alone.

-- 
Her he asked if O'Hare Doctor tidings sent from far     John Cowan
coast and she with grameful sigh him answered that      www.ccil.org/~cowan
O'Hare Doctor in heaven was. Sad was the man that word  www.reutershealth.com
to hear that him so heavied in bowels ruthful. All      jcowan@r...
she there told him, ruing death for friend so young,
algate sore unwilling God's rightwiseness to withsay.   _Ulysses_, "Oxen"

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• References:
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by Date: A modest hyperlinking proposal
• Previous by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• Next by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread