• To: XML-DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: [Ann] Next generation XSL-XHTML tools from ALT Mobile
• From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
• Date: 30 Sep 2002 18:02:58 +0100
• In-reply-to: <AOEKKCOOGNDOAHCLNEIFIEEIDGAA.mike@w...>
• References: <AOEKKCOOGNDOAHCLNEIFIEEIDGAA.mike@w...>

On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 17:45, Michael Fitzgerald wrote:
> I think this kind of message is appropriate for this list. It is (1)
> prefixed as a killable announcement [ANN] (2) brief (3) doesn't contain a
> lot of rah-rah-rah-cis-boom-bah (marketingese). I hope these kinds of
> messages are welcome here.

As one who has railed against commercial intrusions before, I'm inclined
to agree that this post was usefully informative.  I think their mistake
was to use the phrase "next generation" in the subject line, a phrase
which rates alongside "seamless integration" and "enterprise strength"
in my auto-delete triggers.

-- Edd

This is a digitally signed message part

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Nudged OT [Ann] Next generation XSL-XHTML tools from ALT Mobile
    • From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>

• References:
  • RE: [Ann] Next generation XSL-XHTML tools from ALT Mobile
    • From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>

• Prev by Date: XLink/Schema
• Next by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Previous by thread: RE: [Ann] Next generation XSL-XHTML tools from ALT Mobile
• Next by thread: RE: Nudged OT [Ann] Next generation XSL-XHTML tools from ALT Mobile
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread