• To: "Edd Dumbill" <edd@u...>
• Subject: RE: Nudged OT [Ann] Next generation XSL-XHTML tools from ALT Mobile
• From: "Michael Fitzgerald" <mike@w...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:39:27 -0700
• Cc: "XML-DEV" <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <1033405379.12690.123.camel@pingu>

Oh yes. "Next generation"? This may explain why the meaning of 'NG' in
'RELAX NG' has not been documented. -Mike

Edd Dumbill wrote:
> As one who has railed against commercial intrusions before, I'm inclined
> to agree that this post was usefully informative.  I think their mistake
> was to use the phrase "next generation" in the subject line, a phrase
> which rates alongside "seamless integration" and "enterprise strength"
> in my auto-delete triggers.

• References:
  • RE: [Ann] Next generation XSL-XHTML tools from ALT Mobile
    • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: limits of the generic
• Next by Date: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• Previous by thread: RE: [Ann] Next generation XSL-XHTML tools from ALT Mobile
• Next by thread: Re: [Ann] Next generation XSL-XHTML tools from ALT Mobile
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread