• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: XLink/Schema
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:55:00 -0700

On Monday, September 30, 2002, at 09:05 AM, Eric van der Vlist wrote:

> When you first think about it, it seems quite easy to say that
> xhtml:img/@src has a type xlink:href and that xhtml:img has fixed
> attributes xlink:type and friends. There must be some hidden reason why
> this wouldn't work!

I've always assumed that you could model XLink in XML Schema.  Given 
the massive scope of XLink, if it can't model a little language with a 
total of less than a dozen elements and attributes all told, 
something's really wrong.

Doesn't mean that I think it should be compulsory.

Anyhow, if you did this, you could default away almost all the XLink 
machinery but you'd still have xlink:href= on your linking elements, 
which I gather the HTML WG finds unacceptable. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XLink/Schema
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• Next by Date: RE: [Ann] Next generation XSL-XHTML tools from ALT Mobile
• Previous by thread: Re: FW: Groves (was re: bunch of other stuff...)
• Next by thread: Re: XLink/Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread