• To: ndw@n... (Norman Walsh)
• Subject: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:48:05 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <87adlzzbbi.fsf@n...> from "Norman Walsh" at Sep 30, 2002 12:33:53 PM

Norman Walsh scripsit:

> The only significant technical objection I recall hearing against PIs
> was that they didn't have globally unique names. But if we allowed the
> PI target to be a QName...

It can't be.  But a PI target *can* be a notation name, which a NOTATION
declaration then maps to a URI.

Ta-da!

-- 
"No, John.  I want formats that are actually       John Cowan
useful, rather than over-featured megaliths that   http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
address all questions by piling on ridiculous      http://www.reutershealth.com
internal links in forms which are hideously        jcowan@r...
over-complex." --Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• References:
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [Ann] Next generation XSL-XHTML tools from ALT Mobile
• Next by Date: XLink/Schema
• Previous by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• Next by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread