• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:44:56 +0000
• In-reply-to: <B6DED724-D23E-11D6-873D-0003938E7308@t...>
• References: <fus8pu0aq35su7j71cm8t4lm0pmc9abp6a@4...> <B6DED724-D23E-11D6-873D-0003938E7308@t...>

Tim Bray <tbray@t...> wrote:

| On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 08:38 AM, [Name Suppressed] wrote:

| Can we please try to exercise a little self-control over this kind of 
| offensive idiotic childishness?  

This formulation is obviously intended to preclude a straight answer, but
at the considerable risk of being misunderstood, I'll answer anyway:

No.

| This is THE WAY IT'S SUPPOSED TO WORK.  

Another round of the political papered over with the technical?  Whoopee.

• References:
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Next by Date: Re: XML schema type question
• Previous by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Next by thread: Re: TAG on HLink
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread