• To: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
• Subject: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:29:45 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <fus8pu0aq35su7j71cm8t4lm0pmc9abp6a@4...>

On Friday, September 27, 2002, at 08:38 AM, [Name Suppressed] wrote:

> I don't think the W3C expected the XHTML folks to have the courage of
> their convictions.  It's a start.

Can we please try to exercise a little self-control over this kind of 
offensive idiotic childishness?  The HTML folks are part of the W3C.  
There's a difference of opinion.  There are conflicting documents in 
w3.org/TR.  There needs to be an argument.  The TAG published its 
opinion before the F2F was even over because it was so obvious that 
work needs to be done.  An argument is happening in a totally open and 
public venue.  Opinions and positions are going on the record.  Smart 
people are thinking hard.  Usually, this results in progress.  This is 
THE WAY IT'S SUPPOSED TO WORK.  -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (wasRe: TAG on HLink)
• Next by Date: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Previous by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Next by thread: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread