• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:45:29 -0400
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E07A972A6@r...>

Dare Obasanjo writes:
> Simple question: Does HLink fit into the rest of the XML architecture
> that is currently being built by the W3C? My personal opinion is that
> it doesn't and shouldn't 

My personal opinion is that the rest of the XML architecture is in dire
need of a serious refactoring - the same kind of reduction that XML
itself did to SGML.  I think 

> although I agree that the HTML working group
> needs something like this for their unique use case. 

>From my perspective, HTML is hardly a unique use case.

> It's quite interesting to note that although HTML brought the W3C to 
> prominence and XML even more so, the descendants of HTML do not fit in 
> the current vision and body of work the W3C is going forward with. 

I think that's merely a sign of how far off the rails the W3C has gone.

-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

• References:
  • RE: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Next by Date: Re: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Previous by thread: RE: Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Next by thread: Re: RE: Rethinking namespaces,attribute remapping (was Re: TAG on HLink)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread