• To: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 16:01:21 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <SPLHLJKGFALKRLOM861W2XITQTQ93HB.3d82c82c@MChamp>

> <pontification flame-bait="true">XML is worse than ASN.1 for network protocols.
> Worse is better.  Deal with it.</pontification>

Only in terms of serialization.  In terms of other stuff -- e.g., 
development time, integration with Web servers, services, and
architecture -- ASN.1 bites.

Of course, ASN.1 is useless without a serialization, so let's say 
ASN.1/DER.
	/r$

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• Next by Date: RE: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread