• To: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 16:32:09 -0400
• Cc: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209141600110.3599-100000@e...>

9/14/2002 4:01:21 PM, Rich Salz <rsalz@d...> wrote:

>In terms of other stuff -- e.g., 
>development time, integration with Web servers, services, and
>architecture -- ASN.1 bites.

Precisely.  That's why "worse" in the (generally) trivial sense
of CPU/bandwidth efficiency is "better" overall ... and
why Datapower, etc. will be happy to help you throw hardware
at the problem in those situations where XML's inefficiency
leads to a bottleneck.

 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
    • From: Alaric Snell <alaric@a...>

• References:
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread