• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 01:25:00 -0400

9/13/2002 5:19:56 AM, "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...> wrote:

  

>
>So how about we stop trying to [ab]use XML for data and just bind an XSLT 
>engine to a nice XER (http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/xml/) codec, if you REALLY 
>want XSLT 

Beccause throwing hardware at the problem is so much cheaper?  Because the
network effect favors generic, inefficient technologies over 
specialized, efficient ones? 

<pontification flame-bait="true">XML is worse than ASN.1 for network protocols.
Worse is better.  Deal with it.</pontification>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • RE: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration languages]
• Next by Date: RE: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• Previous by thread: RE: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration langu ages]
• Next by thread: RE: [Fwd: Re: The 11-pound solution (fwd)]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread