• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 12:57:52 -0400
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020703124820.00b9dd58@n...>
• References: <72A507IEZTJG82A9WS98IG2UY412VXU.3d232742@MChamp>< <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621D94@r...>

At 12:49 PM 7/3/2002 -0400, Jonathan Robie wrote:
>The other way around, actually.
>
>We started with purely structural typing. We have gone to named typing. 
>The Formal Semantics draft that is currently published has not kept up 
>with the XQuery/ XPath language documents, but the next release will 
>incorporate named typing.

So the named-typing mistake deepens.  Now that's unfortunate.

Simon St.Laurent
"Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Next by Date: Re: IE display unparsed entities (e.g., GIF images)?
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Next by thread: Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread