• To: Mike Champion <mc@x...>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,xml-dev@l...,Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 12:49:38 -0400
• In-reply-to: <72A507IEZTJG82A9WS98IG2UY412VXU.3d232742@MChamp>
• References: < <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621D94@r...>

At 12:33 PM 7/3/2002 -0400, Mike Champion wrote:

>Could you elaborate?  Is the XQuery WG really re-thinking WXSDL named
>types in favor of a more XDuce/RELAX NG-like pattern-based approach?   I
>think I mis-parsed something, or maybe your sense of "unfortunately" is
>not the same as mine :~)

The other way around, actually.

We started with purely structural typing. We have gone to named typing. The 
Formal Semantics draft that is currently published has not kept up with the 
XQuery/ XPath language documents, but the next release will incorporate 
named typing.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Next by Date: Re: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Next by thread: Re: RE: XQuery and DTD/Schema?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread