• To: 'Tim Bray' <tbray@t...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: URIs harmful
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:20:02 -0500

From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]

Joshua Allen wrote:

> On the other hand, it is exceedingly poor form to use identifiers from
> the HTTP scheme for things which you don't intend to be dereferenced
> (via HTTP synchronous GET, no less).

>You might be on to something here.

>How about for things that you don't have any representations for right 
>now but plan to in the near future?  

MessageBox("not yet implemented")

>How about things that you don't have any way of representing right now, 
>but you might someday?  

MessageBox("not yet implemented")

>What are some things that fall into the category "which you don't intend to be 
>dereferenced"? 

len

• Prev by Date: RE: URI indigestion
• Next by Date: RE: URI schemes (was Re: URIs harmful)
• Previous by thread: Re: URIs harmful
• Next by thread: RE: URIs harmful
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread