• To: <bill.dehora@p...>,"Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: URIs harmful
• From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:19:02 -0700
• Thread-index: AcIzqYPvR0xXx7UAS+i5cc3TnNvqLgAYSCGQ
• Thread-topic: URIs harmful

> > Most people wouldn't want to interact with beaches via http.
> 
> But a representation of the beach might be useful to some.

Not really.  The HTTP-accessible *representations* that people might
want, could include representations of:

* a view through a webcam belonging to a gyros vendor on the beach
* a map of the beach, highlighting particular facilities
* opinions and reviews about the beach
* recent news about the beach
* weather reports from the beach

None of those ARE the beach, they are simply things ABOUT the beach.
They all deserve to have their own identity.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: URIs harmful
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: URIs harmful
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DNS based URIs that don't imply access method
• Next by Date: RE: URI indigestion
• Previous by thread: RE: URIs harmful
• Next by thread: Re: URIs harmful
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread