• To: paul@p... (Paul Prescod)
• Subject: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 08:20:32 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: dbox@m... (Don Box), xml-dev@l..., jcowan@r... (John Cowan), clbullar@i... ("Bullard, Claude L (Len)")
• In-reply-to: <3D185D8D.A6A4E7B9@p...> from "Paul Prescod" at Jun 25, 2002 05:09:49 AM

Paul Prescod scripsit:

> John Cowan claims that
> people who spend a reasonable time doing a "taste test" prefer RELAX.

Well, it's conscious hyperbole.  A more serious expression of my
point of view would be that *if* you are not committed to WXS,
you will certainly prefer RNG to DTDs or to no schema language at all.

I think there are deep ideas behind WXS, but the realization of them
is a lot more imperfect than it has to be.  One of my notions was
that it might be interesting to write a non-XML authoring syntax
for it (Ghu knows, I know how to write recursive-descent compilers
in my sleep by now) and see how that makes me feel.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• References:
  • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Next by Date: Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
• Previous by thread: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Next by thread: RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread