• To: "Don Box" <dbox@m...>,"John Cowan" <jcowan@r...>,"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• From: "Don Box" <dbox@m...>
• Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:54:30 -0700
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcIChy3mDf5O05b1T06I+QKmPT9WVAYpk4tgAAFMFSA=
• Thread-topic: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Box
> Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 8:37 PM
> To: John Cowan; Bullard, Claude L (Len)
> Cc: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE:  DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
> 
> Wow! I was knocked out by this one. What good are datatypes if one can
> work in terms of the value space of the type rather than the lexical
> form?

In case it wasn't obvious, that sentence should have read "What good are
datatypes if one CANNOT work in terms of the value space..."

DB

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Logical markup Language
• Next by Date: Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier toauthor) XML
• Previous by thread: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Next by thread: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread