• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
• From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 07:31:35 -0500
• References: <016901c21af5$f5275320$0200a8c0@e...> <3D163BB5.31362495@p...> <049e01c21b38$00b362f0$4bc8a8c0@A...> <3D177062.5070508@y...>

Just to add one more point (though it has already been stated otherwise) I
am sure we are all aware of the original goals for XML in the backs of our
minds-- but this would violate point 5 [1]

http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-origin-goals

Best Regards,
Jeff Rafter
Defined Systems
http://www.defined.net
XML Development and Developer Web Hosting

• References:
  • Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
    • From: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@e...>
  • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
    • From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Next by Date: Re: on the subject of schema crunching...
• Previous by thread: Re: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML
• Next by thread: Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread