• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:59:00 +1000
• References: <4F4182C71C1FDD4BA0937A7EB7B8B4C10576C6F2@r...>

From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>

> "If everyone develops their own data, schemas and definitions, we have a
> Tower of Babel and we haven't gotten what we wanted."

> That pretty much sums it up.

So if a computer makes up a schema automatically to fit some data (e.g. .NET)
that is good, but if a person does it, it is bad?

Puzzled
Rick

• References:
  • RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
    • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9
• Next by Date: RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
• Previous by thread: RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
• Next by thread: RE: Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread